(March 2024)
The Jewelry and Furs Form is an inland marine coverage
focusing on individually owned furs and jewelry.
Purchasing separate coverage facilitates protection at
amounts that best reflect a special property’s value. Valuation is typically
based upon relevant documentation such as a current appraisal or sales receipt.
Separate protection is important because severe coverage limitations exist in
standard homeowners policies for such property.
Inland marine coverage can be purchased using this form to
cover a single class of property. Coverage is also available under a personal
articles floater. The latter provides protection for jewelry and furs along
with several other property classes.
Related Articles:
PM 00 09 Personal Articles Standard Loss Settlement Form
HO 04 61–Scheduled Personal Property Endorsement
The schedule has space to indicate coverage for the
following:
·
Amount of insurance and premium for all jewelry
that is scheduled
·
Amount of insurance and premium for all furs
that are listed as scheduled property
·
Property Scheduled
The schedule includes a reference that property, if specially
marked, will be subject to the Agreed Value Loss Settlement provision in PM 00
01–Common Policy Provisions. There is also reference regarding separate
indication that must be made to items that the policyholder is to store in a
vault.
Related Article: Common Policy Provisions
Jewelry and Furs Form coverage applies globally to all items
listed as covered property. Such property must be owned by the named insured.
Example: Gregory is upset over news from his insurer.
His claim involving theft of expensive, jeweled cufflinks and a ring has been
reduced. The ring belongs to Gregory, but he had borrowed the cufflinks from
his grandfather and that part of the loss is not covered. |
Of
course, other provisions or conditions may affect coverage.
Related Court Case: Suit Limitation Waived By
Insurer
1. Scheduled Jewelry and Furs
Insures against all risks of
direct loss to the property (jewelry and furs) that is specifically listed in
the schedule. Coverage applies only when an insurance amount and premium is
shown next to a given property class.
Reference must be made to Paragraph
D.1. Loss Settlement in the PM 00 01–Common Policy Provisions because that
provision includes coverage limitations.
Related Article: Common
Policy Provisions
2. Newly Acquired Property
a. An important coverage benefit of the jewelry and furs form is
the automatic coverage for newly acquired items. The automatic limit is 25% of
the amount of insurance for the class of property involved or $10,000,
whichever is less.
b. The newly acquired property feature is particularly helpful
since persons who schedule coverage are likely to be persons who collect
higher-valued property. This coverage feature allows such persons reasonable
time to remember to report their new property and, most importantly, have their
coverage adjusted.
This form states that coverage
ceases on a newly acquired item if it is not reported within 30 days (or at the
end of the policy period if it arrives first). Another requirement is that the
named insured pays all due, additional premium for the new item as of the acquisition
date.
Example: An
insured has a separate fur and jewelry policy with 2/1/21 to 2/1/22 policy
dates. The policy has the following schedule: |
||
Item |
Insurance Limit |
|
Mink coat (long) |
$7,500 |
|
Rabbit coat w/hood |
$400 |
|
Leather raincoat |
$1,600 |
|
Lynx jacket |
$5,200 |
|
Raccoon jacket |
$2,400 |
|
Total |
$17,100 |
|
Scenario 1: On May 5th, the insured buys an
ermine-trimmed leather coat for $5,500. On May 23, the coat is stolen during
a break-in at the insured’s home. If the purchase were not yet reported, the
insured could recover a maximum of $4,275 on the item since that represents
25% of the current scheduled coverage. |
Scenario 2: On May 5th, the insured buys an
ermine-trimmed leather coat for $5,500. On June 11, the coat is stolen during
a break-in at the insured’s home. If the purchase were not yet reported, the
insured could not recover anything for the loss since the acquisition was not
reported within 30 days or in this case, by June 5th. |
Scenario 3: On May 5th, the insured
buys an emerald ring for $3,200. On May 23, the ring is stolen during a
break-in at the insured’s home. If the purchase were not yet reported, the
insured could not recover anything. Even though the loss occurred less than
30 days from the ring’s acquisition, the insured has only scheduled FURS (and
leather), so the 25% limit is inapplicable to the JEWELRY. |
Jewelry and Furs Forms coverage is inapplicable to a number
of situations. Specifically, under the following:
1. Gems that are not in jewelry mountings
2. Precious metals (silver, gold, platinum, etc.) not in common
form, including bullion
3. Goldware, pewterware, platinumware and silverware, including
such property plated with these metals
4. Flatware, hollowware, tea sets, trays and trophies made of materials
which include precious metals (including plating)
5. Regardless the type of property, if it is contraband or is
involved in any form of illegal activity, it is disqualified as covered
property.
The ISO Jewelry and Furs Form protects against all forms of
direct, physical loss. However, it does not insure against loss or damage
caused by:
1. Wear and tear, or gradual deterioration
2. Inherent vice, insects, or vermin
This insurance is subject to the policy deductible that
appears on the declaration page.
The ISO Jewelry and Furs Form offers several additional
coverages as options that supplement its base coverage. The following options
are in effect if the policy shows that they have been selected either in the declarations
or elsewhere.
1. Jewelry Pair or Set Broad Coverage
When this option is selected, the
Loss To A Pair, Sets Or Parts in PM 00 01–Common Policy Provisions Form that
applies to jewelry is replaced by this item which provides the following:
When loss occurs to scheduled
jewelry which is a pair, set, or consists of multiple parts, the insurer has
the option of paying the full, scheduled value for the complete pair, set or
multiple part item; then the named insured must surrender any remaining, existing
parts of the item to the insurance company.
This option lends reasonableness
to the settlement process. Sometimes a loss will involve matched set property
which, for all practical purposes, cannot be made complete if part of the set
is lost or destroyed. Though a cash settlement is not a perfect option, it at
least provides some level of compensation when property just cannot be restored
or replaced.
2. Jewelry in Vault Credit
When the named insured
accepts this premium credit, the following stipulations apply:
a. Specified jewelry indicated on the policy Schedule with a number
mark (#) next to the item description must be stored within a vault. The vault
must be located at an institution (bank or security firm) appearing in the
declarations or elsewhere in the policy.
b. No coverage applies to article damage or loss when such articles
are not located as stipulated. However, an exception is granted if, before
removing the property, the insurance company is notified and has already been
paid a premium to cover the additional exposure during the removal period.
3. Additional Person Insured – Engagement Ring, Wedding Ring Or Guard
Ring Only
When this option applies, another
party with a legitimate financial interest in a specified article of jewelry must
be listed on the policy or in the declarations. However, that status is ONLY
with regard to the identified jewelry item. The insured specifically agrees
that such additional interest has no covered status regarding any other part of
the policy.
Example: Tara is on her way home from work when she’s robbed.
Besides her purse and necklace, the robber also takes her platinum engagement
ring. The ring contained diamonds. Kevin, her fiancé, shared an appraisal for
the ring 10 months earlier when they became engaged. Tara added it to her
policy’s jewelry schedule for the appraised value of $6,500. Tara also listed
Kevin as an additional person insured. |
|
Scenario 1: Tara’s
insurance company pays Tara $4,000 and Kevin is paid $2,500, the amount he still
owed on payments. |
Scenario 2: Tara’s
insurance company pays Tara $6,500 and Kevin is paid nothing since, at the
time of the loss, the ring had been paid for in full. |